WebMar 30, 2024 · When these four conditions are satisfied, i.e. ( i) sales are recorded in the books ( ii) books are audited ( iii) the sales are reflected in the stock register and ( iv) sales matches with the sales declared to the VAT department, the onus lying on the assessee is discharged. 2.1 For discharging the onus and for proving that cash deposit in ... WebThe genesis of the case is the Information which was received by the A.O. from DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai that there are some parties who are engaged in hawala transactions and are involved in issuing bogus bills for sale of material without delivery of goods, which information was based on information received from Maharashtra Sales Tax Authorities ...
143(3) – itatonline.org
WebMay 8, 2024 · The Income Tax Officer in this case has made 100% addition on account of bogus purchase resulting in disallowance of Rs. 56,085/-. Upon assessee’s appeal ld. … WebOct 23, 2009 · Case laws on bogus purchases in favour of assessee Case law: 16 DTR 278 CIT V/s SINUJA FOODS P LTD (2008 (10) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT ... consumption or sale of goods suspected, revenue therefrom credited in P & l a/c ec. External and third party evidences like transporters note, insurance policy cover, etc. ill be highly useful. A party … jaxon smith-njigba stats
Case laws - bogus purchases, Income Tax
Web•Similar provision in VAT law - On Quest Merchandising India Pvt.Ltd. Vs.Commissioner of Trade – Delhi(2024) HC struck down a similar provision under Delhi VAT Act as violative of Article 14 . SLP dismissed with rider that it can be used in case only in Fraud cases. – •Bombay HC decision in case of Mahalaxmi Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil WebMar 10, 2024 · 3 conflict of laws cases materials and problems google books web feb 26 2024 in her casebook conflict of laws now in its second edition internationally WebJan 25, 2024 · The A.O. thus made an addition of Rs. 1,42,34,578/- on account of alleged bogus purchases from Hawala dealers/parties. An appeal was preferred by the assessee before the CIT (Appeals). The appeal was allowed interalia on the ground that the A.O. having not disputed the sales, it was not a case of bogus purchases and that it was at … kutan bakery